|
The Governance Scope regulates the governance processes and balance of power of the Sky Ecosystem. The Governance Scope must ensure that the resilient equilibrium of Sky Governance remains protected against all potential direct and indirect threats.
View Provenance
This Article regulates the Monthly Governance Cycle, which provides a predictable monthly framework by which Sky Governance decisions are made.
View Provenance
This Section defines the Atlas Edit Monthly Cycle, which provides a predictable framework for monthly edits to the Atlas. The Atlas Edit Monthly Cycle is implemented via the Atlas Edit Proposal (AEP) framework. In the transition to Endgame, the Atlas can be edited through the submission of an AEP. Multiple amendments to multiple components of the Atlas are allowed to be submitted in a single AEP. A single AEP may seek to remove multiple components of the Atlas.AEPs must always adhere to the Spirit of the Atlas and remain within the bounds of Universal Alignment.
Supporting Documents
If multiple Atlas Edit Proposals editing the same component of the Atlas are approved by voters in the same Monthly Governance Cycle, the Reconciliation Process documented herein must be followed.
View Provenance
Where voters approve multiple Atlas Edit Proposals that seek to edit the same component or components of the Atlas within the same Governance Cycle, the process described below must be followed. This process only applies to the specific components that are being simultaneously edited. Other amended components that do not have edits in simultaneous proposals may be merged, unless they are dependent on the component that does have simultaneous edits.Where simultaneous edits are non-conflicting / logically compatible: Governance Facilitators will consolidate them into a single edit either by stitching them together in the affected component or by stringing one after the other as a new component. Any action taken by the Governance Facilitators in this regard will be documented publicly and should be available for examination prior to the end date of the relevant ratification polls.Where simultaneous edits are conflicting / logically incompatible and cannot be coherently reconciled: it falls to voters to decide which of the conflicting AEPs they wish to accept. If there are two conflicting AEPs, a subsequent binary vote is appropriate in the form of a Reconciliation Process Poll. In the event there are more than two conflicting AEPs, the Governance Facilitators may choose a suitable polling method that allows voters to choose between multiple options. The difference between the conflicting amendments must be clearly presented so that voters can make an informed choice on their preferred option.A Reconciliation Process poll will take place during the Operational Weekly Cycle immediately following the closure of the ratification polls. The Reconciliation Process poll will last for three days.